Equipment Financing

MRI and CT Scanner Financing: Medical Imaging Equipment Loans and Leases

Finance or Lease EditorialMay 17, 20267 min read

The imaging center decision is usually one of the highest-stakes capital equipment decisions a healthcare organization makes. A 1.5T MRI system from Siemens, GE, or Philips is a $900,000–$1.8 million purchase before siting, installation, and the RF shielding room that the magnet requires. A 64-slice CT scanner is $400,000–$900,000, depending on manufacturer and configuration.

Dr. Anita Patel had been sending imaging referrals to a competing imaging center for nine years. She ran a busy primary care group with four locations and knew — had known for years — that the volume she was sending out should be staying inside her own network. The business case had always been there. The capital had been the blocker.

When she finally financed her first 1.5T MRI and 64-slice CT for a dedicated imaging center adjacent to her largest practice location, the process was more straightforward than she'd feared. Here's what she learned.

The Medical Imaging Equipment Categories

MRI systems ($700,000–$3M+): The most capital-intensive imaging equipment category. 1.5T (tesla) systems are the standard for most outpatient and community hospital applications. 3T systems provide higher resolution for neurological and specialized applications but cost 40–80% more. Open MRI systems ($300,000–$600,000) serve patients with claustrophobia concerns but have lower throughput and resolution than closed bore systems.

Major manufacturers: Siemens Healthineers (MAGNETOM series), GE Healthcare (SIGNA series), Philips (Ingenia), Canon Medical, Hitachi.

CT scanners ($350,000–$1.5M+): Computed tomography systems range from basic 16-slice units used in urgent care and smaller facilities to high-end 256-slice or dual-source systems for advanced cardiac and trauma applications. 64-slice represents a practical standard for most outpatient and community facilities.

Major manufacturers: Siemens (SOMATOM), GE Healthcare (Revolution), Philips (Incisive), Canon Medical (Aquilion), United Imaging.

The site preparation reality: MRI systems require a shielded room (RF shielding, acoustic dampening, magnet-specific siting) that costs $200,000–$500,000 to build. This infrastructure cost is real and separate from the scanner itself. Some lenders will include the RF shielding room in the equipment finance package; others require that facility infrastructure go through a commercial real estate loan. Clarify this with your lender before closing.

Healthcare Equipment Financing: A Different Underwriting World

Medical imaging equipment financing is evaluated differently from general commercial equipment financing, for reasons worth understanding:

Reimbursement visibility: Imaging revenue is largely tied to insurance reimbursement rates — Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial payers have published rates for CPT codes. A lender financing a 1.5T MRI knows that 70612 (brain MRI with contrast) reimbursed at approximately $550–$800 depending on payer mix, and that a system completing 8–12 scans per day has a reasonably predictable revenue profile. This revenue visibility is a positive for underwriting.

Healthcare-specific lenders: There are equipment finance companies that specialize specifically in healthcare — Cardinal Health Finance, Siemens Financial Services, GE Healthcare Financial, Stryker Finance, and many independent healthcare equipment lenders. These lenders understand HIPAA, healthcare reimbursement cycles, hospital systems' fiscal years, and physician group practice structures in ways that general commercial lenders don't. For imaging equipment over $300,000, working with a healthcare-specialized lender (or a broker who has strong healthcare relationships) produces materially better terms.

Tax-exempt status: Non-profit hospitals and health systems can access tax-exempt financing with municipal bond or specialty programs that offer significantly below-market rates. If you're a 501(c)(3) healthcare organization, ask specifically about tax-exempt equipment financing — the difference can be 2–4 percentage points.

New vs. Used/Refurbished Imaging Equipment

The medical imaging equipment refurbishment market is mature and legitimate. Companies like Block Imaging, Amber Diagnostics, USOC Medical, and LabX specialize in certified refurbished imaging systems that can be purchased at 30–60% of new system prices.

A refurbished 2019 Siemens MAGNETOM Essenza 1.5T with full warranty from a reputable refurb provider: $350,000–$480,000 vs. $1.1M+ new. The RF shielding room costs the same either way.

Financing refurbished imaging equipment is possible — but not with all lenders, and the due diligence requirements are higher:

  • Refurbisher's warranty and certified condition documentation
  • Service contract availability post-warranty
  • Software version and parts support timeline
  • OEM or certified third-party service contract

Work with a healthcare equipment finance specialist for refurbished imaging transactions. The documentation requirements are specific, and a generalist lender may mishandle the application.

2026 Rate Ranges for Medical Imaging Financing

Strong borrowers (established hospitals, health systems, large physician groups):

  • New 1.5T MRI from major OEM: 6.5%–9.5%
  • New 64-slice CT: 7%–9.5%
  • Certified refurbished systems (reputable refurber with warranty): 8%–12%

Mid-tier borrowers (smaller physician groups, startup imaging centers):

  • New systems: 9.5%–14%
  • Refurbished: 11%–15%

Operating leases: Many imaging centers prefer operating lease structures for MRI and CT equipment because it keeps the capital off the balance sheet (important for hospital systems managing debt covenants) and provides technology refresh options at end of term. MRI technology evolves — a 2026 3T system has meaningfully better spectral and diffusion capabilities than a 2019 system.

An FMV lease on a $1.4M MRI system over 84 months is a common structure for hospital-adjacent imaging facilities. The equipment leasing page has more detail on FMV lease structures.

Terms: New imaging systems: 60–84 months for purchase, 60–84 months for FMV lease. Refurbished: 36–60 months.

Dr. Patel's Structure

Profile: 22-year established physician group, $8.2 million in revenue, strong FICO, first imaging equipment purchase.

She financed the 1.5T MRI and 64-slice CT as a package with the RF shielding room through a healthcare-specialized lender. Total project: $2.1 million.

Structure: 84-month FMV lease, quarterly payments timed to the practice's fiscal quarter billing cycle.

Monthly equivalent payment: approximately $28,500

Volume projection: 12 MRI scans and 8 CT scans per day, 5 days/week. At average reimbursement of $650/scan blended: approximately $130,000/month in gross imaging revenue. The payment represented about 22% of projected revenue — high in year one while patient volumes ramped, dropping to 12–15% as referral volumes reached capacity.

Year one actual: 18 months to reach projected volume. The ramp was slower than the model. By year two, the imaging center was covering the payment by month three.

Model your imaging system with the equipment loan calculator or contact us for a more complex lease structure quote. Get a quote — medical imaging is a specialized category and we'll connect you with healthcare-focused lenders who understand it.

MRI financingCT scanner financingmedical imaging equipment financingradiology equipment loanimaging center equipment lease

Found this helpful?

Share it with a fellow business owner who's navigating financing decisions.

Ready to explore your options?

Get a personalized quote in minutes — no obligation, no hard credit pull.

Get a Free Quote